This Finding debunks common myths about hand counting, showing they lack evidence and can be countered with facts.
MYTH: There Are Lots Of “Objections” To Hand-Counting Ballots
If you bring up “hand counting” to an elected official, you will likely hear “objections” in response. However, if they fail to support their stance with evidence, those objections are just myths.
Definitions of Objections, Myths, and Findings
What is an objection? It is a reason or argument presented in opposition. An objection should be based on “grounds.” Think of a courtroom scene in a movie where one lawyer yells, “I object.” The opposing lawyer fires back, “on what grounds?” The court will override the objection without “grounds” or a basis of fact.
It should be expected that someone making an objection, especially a government official, can prove that what they say is verified, proven, or based on a case study or investigation.
Most Objections are Myths
When someone pushes an objection, asking for their source or grounds is a good idea. Almost always, in my experience, they have nothing to cite.
Understanding the benefits of hand counting and the findings that debunk the myths is essential. Be prepared for these conversations by using the tools that have been developed and are explained throughout this section.
Click the PDF icon to read the complete Findings document.
View the full details in the one-pager Most Hand Counting Objections Are Myths.
Date:
2025-03-29
eManual Section:
9
eManual Section Title:
Myth-Debunking Workbook
eManual SubSection Title:
Finding: Real Objections Have Grounds, Most Objections are Myths
eManual page number:
241
fusion_builder_status:
active
avada_post_views_count:
846
avada_today_post_views_count:
3
avada_post_views_count_today_date:
23-09-2025
post_excerpt:
